mFax vs ETHERFAX

mFax specializes in affordable cloud fax solutions, while ETHERFAX secures document delivery with costs tailored to your unique business requirements.

mFax vs EtherFAX

COMPARING ETHERFAX AND MFAX

 Price per pageHIPAA ComplianceSecure Fax TransmissionseSignature ToolFax API
ETHERFAXCustom pricing YesYesNoYes
mFax5¢YesYesNoYes

Feature Review

mFax vs ETHERFAX Pricing comparison

mFax vs ETHERFAX Pricing

mFax has three affordable subscription plans for its users, especially for small businesses and organizations.

  • Professional Plan: $75 per month, with 800 pages
  • Business Plan: $150 per month, with 2,500 pages
  • Enterprise Plan: $300 per month, with 6,00 pages
  • Custom Plan: Customized pricing tailored to your needs.

As for ETHERFAX, they don’t have a fixed monthly or annual subscription. The pricing will depend on what your specific requirements and needs are. You need to contact them first and discuss the details by yourself.

Both fax services are secure.

mFax utilizes 256-bit Advanced Encryption and TLS 1.2 security protocols for their platform. Aside from being HIPAA compliant, they are also GLBA, SOX, and PCI-DDS compliant. It also implements two-factor authentication to protect its users from unauthorized access. This will ensure that all the data transmitted and stored through the system is encrypted and secured.

ETHERFAX uses a software-defined network (SDN) technology called Secure Exchange Network (SEN). The mFax alternative is also SOC 1 Type 2 and SOC 2 Type II compliant, HITRUST CSF, and PCI DSS certified. It ensures that the sensitive information going through their platform remains protected and is only accessible to authorized individuals.

Both mFax and ETHERFAX are secure.
Both mFax and ETHERFAX are HIPAA compliant.

mFax and ETHERFAX are HIPAA compliant.

Healthcare providers can use either ETHERFAX or mFax as their HIPAA-compliant fax solution. The two services comply with HIPAA and other data security regulations, such as GLBA and PCI DSS. Both provide signed Business Associate Agreements (BAA), which makes them legally bound to implement the necessary measures to keep protected health information (PHI) safe at all times.

Both fax services lack in-built eSignature capabilities.

With mFax, electronically signing faxes is possible through mSign integration. Despite sharing the same parent developer, both services act as standalone platforms. You’ll need a separate mSign subscription, which can get costly if you’re on a limited budget.

As an mFax alternative, ETHERFAX also does not directly support electronic signatures. You’ll have to use a third-party service to eSign faxes or sign the documents by hand.

Both mFax and ETHERFAX lack in-built signing capabilities.
mFax and ETHERFAX have APIs and developer support.

ETHERFAX and mFax have APIs and developer support.

mFax’s API allows developers to integrate faxing capabilities into their applications. Its programmable API has numerous functions, such as sending and receiving faxes, managing contacts, and tracking fax statuses. Additionally, mFax provides developer support via a dedicated developer portal, which incorporates documentation, pattern code, and a sandbox environment for testing out integrations. 

ETHERFAX offers a wide range of developer tools, including a RESTful interface and webhooks, which allow developers to build custom applications. They support multiple programming languages for their API integration, such as PHP, Python, and Java. 

Both services provide fax broadcasting features.

mFax allows users to send faxes simultaneously to as many as 1,000 recipients via their mFax web portal. It also has a 500 MB file size limit for all attachments per pax, and each file size should not exceed 100 MB.

On the other hand, ETHERFAX allows applications to schedule and create fax broadcasts, ensuring the efficient delivery of faxes to multiple recipients without delays.

Both mFax and ETHERFAX provide fax broadcasting features.
mFax and ETHERFAX - which is better

Verdict: Choosing between mFax vs ETHERFAX

The verdict of this ETHERFAX and mFax comparison will depend on your specific needs and faxing demands. One thing is sure. Both are HIPAA, GLBA, and PCI-DDS compliant, making them suitable for healthcare fax communications.

If you are looking for an affordable option that offers flexibility in fax broadcasting, then mFax would be a better choice. It offers affordable prices that are suitable for small businesses. On the other hand, if you have specific requirements and needs, ETHERFAX has the edge, especially if you have fax servers, as this service provides a secure network.

iFax is the leading alternative to
mFax and ETHERFAX

Maximized Savings

iFax offers the cheapest HIPAA fax solution, starting at $0.01 per page and plans as low as $8.33 monthly.

Robust Integration

Easily integrate faxing to HubSpot, Salesforce, Zapier or WordPress platforms via programmable API.

eSign Faxes

iFax allows you easily sign fax documents without needing a third party eSignature software.

“I would definitely recommend them”

 
“Our organization has been using this iFax service for a few months now which has been working very well. The customer service team are excellent, they have been very helpful in explaining our usage and how we can benefit from upgrading to a better package that will cost us less instead of trying to sell us more than we need.”
 
Shamin R.
Digital Marketing Mentor

“Cloud-Based Faxing”

“It was cheaper compared to other providers, the ease of use and very intuitive design and the reliability of the faxes being sent. My team and I always get great support from the team whenever an issue needs to be dealt with.”

 
John M., CIO (Medical Practice)
 
 

“I compared the most popular online fax services iFax is overall the best value and feature rich!”

“Great customer service! The Google Workspace integration has been great for our organization. Everyone likes it compared to our previous service.”

 
Omar C., IT Expert (Non-Profit)

 

Switch to iFax to optimize productivity and maximize savings

Reach out to our team to see iFax's robust features in action.
“Easy to use”
 
“It was great and easy to use. I will use it again. I didn’t have to go anywhere to fax or provide my credit card number.”
 
Jacinda T., Medical Records (Hospital & Health Care)
 
Arrow-up